To accompany the paper:
Lockton, D., Forlano, L., Fass, J., Brawley, L. (2020). ‘Thinking with Things: Landscapes, Connections and Performances as Modes of Building Shared Understanding’. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, forthcoming
which was restricted to just 20 references in the paper itself, we offer this extended set of references and further reading which was compiled by the four authors. It is of course incomplete, and in time we hope to expand this further.
A sibling paper about the same workshops, examining the methods from a systemic design perspective
Lockton, D., Brawley, L. Aguirre Ulloa, M., Prindible, M., Forlano, L., Rygh, K., Fass, J., Herzog, K., Nissen, B. 2019. ‘Tangible Thinking: Materializing how we imagine and understand interdisciplinary systems, experiences, and relationships’. In: Proceedings of RSD8: Relating Systems Thinking and Design Symposium, 17–19 October 2019, Chicago. PDF
On externalising thinking through drawing, modelling, and other methods
Aguirre Ulloa, M., & Paulsen, A. (2017). Co-designing with relationships in mind. FormAkademisk – forskningstidsskrift for design og designdidaktikk, 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1608
Bowden, F., Lockton, D., Gheerawo, R. and Brass, C. 2015. Drawing Energy: Exploring Perceptions of the Invisible. London: Royal College of Art
Chueng-Nainby, P. & Gong, M. 2013. “Collective Imagery: A Framework for Co-Design.”
Hartel, J., Noone, R., Oh, C., Power, S., Danzanov, P., & Kelly, B. 2018. The iSquare protocol: combining research, art, and pedagogy through the draw-and-write technique. Qualitative Research, 18(4), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117722193
Fass, J., 2016. Self Constructed Representations: Design Research in Participatory Situations, DRS2018.
Jonassen, D. and Cho, Y.H., 2008. Externalizing mental models with mindtools. In Understanding models for learning and instruction (pp. 145-159). Springer, Boston, MA.
Kirsh, D., 2010. Thinking with external representations. AI & society, 25(4), 441-454; p. 448.
Oates, M., Ahmadullah, Y., Marsh, A., Swoopes, C., Zhang, S., Balebako, R., and Cranor, L.F. 2018. Turtles, Locks, and Bathrooms: Understanding Mental Models of Privacy Through Illustration. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (4):5–32. DOI:10.1515/popets-2018-0029
Ricketts, D. and Lockton, D., 2019. Mental landscapes: externalizing mental models through metaphors. interactions, 26(2), pp.86-90.
Senge, Peter M. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business, 2006.
Sturdee, M. and Lindley, J. 2019. Sketching & Drawing as Future Inquiry in HCI. In Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019 (HTTF 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 18, 1–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363402
Tversky, B. 2015. The Cognitive Design of Tools of Thought. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6, 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-014-0214-3
On design, probes and prototyping
Mattelmäki, T. (2008). Probing for co-exploring. CoDesign – International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 4(1), 65–78.
B. Gaver, T. Dunne, and E. Pacenti, “Design: cultural probes,” interactions, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 21-29, 1999.
M. Halpern, I. Erickson, L. Forlano, and G. Gay, “Designing Collaboration: Comparing Cases Exploring Cultural Probes as Boundary-Negotiating Objects,” in Computer Supported Collaborative Work, San Antonio, TX, 2013.
Galey and S. Ruecker, “How a prototype argues,” Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 405-424, 2010.
R. Wakkary, W. Odom, S. Hauser, G. Hertz, and H. Lin, “Material speculation: Actual artifacts for critical inquiry,” in Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives, 2015: Aarhus University Press, pp. 97-108.
Boer, L. and Donovan, J., 2012, June. Provotypes for participatory innovation. In Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference (pp. 388-397).
L. Forlano and M. Halpern, “Reimagining Work: Entanglements and Frictions around Future of Work Narratives,” Fibreculture, no. 26, pp. 32-59, 2016.
L. Forlano, “Stabilizing/Destabilizing the Driverless City: Speculative Futures and Autonomous Vehicles,” International Journal of Communication, vol. 13, 2019.
Liz Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2014. From designing to co-designing to collective dreaming: three slices in time. interactions 21, 6 (October 2014), 24–33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2670616
Sanders, Liz, and Pieter Jan Stappers. Convivial Design Toolbox: Generative Research for the Front End of Design. BIS, 2012.
Wallace, J., McCarthy, J., Wright, P.C., and Olivier, P.. 2013. Making design probes work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3441–3450. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466473
Zeisel, J., 2006. Inquiry by design. Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning.
On making and materials in the humanities and design more broadly
C. Lury and N. Wakeford, Inventive Methods: The happening of the social. New York, NY: Routledge, 2012.
H.-J. Rheinberger, Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.B. Ewenstein and J. Whyte, “Knowledge Practices in Design: The Role of Visual Representations as ‘Epistemic Objects’,” Organization Studies, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 7-30, 2009.
K. Henderson, “Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering,” Science Technology & Human Values, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 448-473, 1991.
S. L. Star and J. R. Griesemer, “Institutional ecology,translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39,” Social studies of science, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 387-420, 1989.
P. Galison, “Trading with the Enemy,” in Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration, M. E. Gorman Ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010, pp. 25-52.
Lange-Berndt, Petra. 2015. Materiality.
B. Latour, “Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern,” Critical inquiry, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 225-248, 2004.xt
Candy, L., 2006. Practice based research: A guide. CCS report, 1, pp.1-19.
McCormack, D.P., 2008. Thinking-spaces for research-creation. Inflexions, 1(1), pp.1-16.
J. Sayers, Making Things and Drawing Boundaries: Experiments in the Digital Humanities. University of Minnesota Press, 2018.
M. Ratto, “Critical making: Conceptual and material studies in technology and social life,” The Information Society, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 252-260, 2011.
Lange-Berndt, Petra. 2015. Materiality.
On data physicalisation and materialisation
Huron, S., Carpendale, S., Thudt, A., Tang, A., and Mauerer, M. 2014. Constructive visualization. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 433–442. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598566
Huron, S., Gourlet, P., Hinrichs, U., Hogan, T., Jansen, Y. 2017. Let’s Get Physical: Promoting Data Physicalization in Workshop Formats. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1409–1422. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/
Lean, M. 2019. Designing the Affective Material Palette. Using materials to explore the experience of systems and technologies designed to aid behaviour change, The Design Journal, 22:sup1, 2177-2178, DOI: 10.1080/14606925.2019.1595462
Offenhuber, D., 2019. Data by Proxy—Material Traces as Autographic Visualizations. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 26(1), pp.98-108.
Thudt, A., Hinrichs, U., Huron, S., and Carpendale, S.. 2018. Self-Reflection and Personal Physicalization Construction. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 154, 1–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173728
Julie Thompson Klein, 1999. Mapping Interdisciplinary Studies. Vol. 2.;2nd.;. Washington, D.C: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Biagioli, Mario. “Postdisciplinary Liaisons: Science Studies and the Humanities.” Critical Inquiry 35, no. 4 (2009): 816-33. Accessed February 5, 2020, p. 818. doi:10.1086/599586.
On bigger concepts
Ahmed, S., 2019. What’s the Use?: On the Uses of Use. Duke University Press, p 46.
Ahmed, S., 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Duke University Press.
M. S. Granovetter, “The Strength of Weak Ties,” The American Journal of Sociology, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1360-1380, 1973.
D. J. Haraway, “SF: Science Fiction, Speculative Fabulation, String Figures, So Far,” ADA: A Journal of Gender New Media & Technology, no. 3, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://adanewmedia.org/2013/11/issue3-haraway/.
Snowden, D., 2000. Cynefin, a sense of time and place: an ecological approach to sense making and learning in formal and informal communities.